menu
vertical · agencies · marketing, design, dev
run every client from one system without making every client sound the same.
Content OS gives each account its own offer, audience, voice, campaigns, approvals, and performance context. Floeberg Studio can build the agency site, intake, client views, and operating workflows around it.
The usual failure mode: every client’s strategy lives in a different doc, the voice drifts toward whoever wrote the last batch, and approvals happen in whichever channel the client answered. Per-client workspaces fix the drift — each account generates from its own foundation, reviews through one approval flow, and publishes to its own domain.
content os self-serve from $49/mo · no setup fee · studio builds from $7,499
the client-workspace problem
three ways multi-client work leaks quality.
- Strategy scattered per client. Offers in a deck, audience notes in a doc, the voice in your best writer’s head. A workspace that holds the account foundation means anyone on the team can produce on-strategy work for that client, not just whoever set it up.
- Voice convergence. When ten accounts share one prompt library, they start sounding like one brand. Per-workspace voice profiles and campaign history keep each account generating from its own context.
- Approvals in five channels. Email threads, Slack DMs, comments in three tools. One review-and-approve flow per workspace gives the account lead a queue instead of a scavenger hunt.
also · floeberg content os
Producing content across clients? content os standardizes the weekly loop, so quality stops depending on your best person's time and starts living in a system.
explore content os →proof · shipped for agency-shape practices
what a multi-system engagement actually looks like.
studio build · connected systems
AM Training Hall
Coach Tri Nguyen · coaching practice
Operator dashboard, automated email flows, and a Discord-native community system shipped together. Five disconnected apps collapsed into one operator surface — the shape a multi-system agency build takes.
read the case →
studio build · second engagement
Active Krew
Coach Tri Nguyen · same client, second build
Lead-gen surface that funnels qualified intake straight into the existing platform CRM. The pattern of “first build proves the relationship; second build adds the next layer” applied.
read the case →
common questions · agencies
common questions
You're basically a competitor. Why would we hire you?
Floeberg Studio builds for founder-led businesses — and for agencies, the thing agencies never build for themselves: their own site, intake, and operating workflows. Content OS is a tool your agency runs for its clients, not a service competing for them. The overlap with the client work that pays your bills is small.
How does one system keep clients from sounding the same?
Each client is its own workspace in Content OS, with its own offers, audience, voice profile, campaign history, and performance context. Hooks and scripts generate from that workspace’s foundation, not from a shared template — which is exactly why two accounts run side by side without converging on the same voice.
Can client work be approved before it ships?
Yes. The workflow is generate → review → approve: nothing publishes without a human sign-off, and the review step is where your team applies account judgment. Roles keep who-can-approve separate from who-can-draft.
Can we white-label the output for our clients?
Client sites publish on their own custom domains (the Agency plan carries multiple), and the content carries the client’s brand, not Floeberg’s. The workspace tooling itself is Floeberg’s product — we do not white-label the app, but nothing client-facing needs to show it.
How does this work with our project-management stack (Asana, Linear, ClickUp, Notion)?
A Studio systems build can read project status from your PM tool and surface a unified operator view — dashboards on top of the data you already have, not a replacement for it. Exotic PM tools get quoted at scoping.
What if our agency is small (under 5 people)?
Start with Content OS on your busiest accounts — the per-client workspace discipline pays off immediately and the plan scales with account count. The Studio build for your own site and workflows makes sense once the team is big enough that handoffs, not hours, are the constraint.
Will you sign an MSA?
A documented SOW + Stripe checkout is the contract for builds. Care runs on a simple monthly agreement. If your agency has a procurement process that needs an MSA, mention it on the intro call and we'll find a path. The flat structure is part of what keeps the price honest.
How is client data separated?
Workspaces are isolated per client: offers, audience notes, campaign history, and generated work live inside that workspace and never feed another client’s output. Access is per-seat, so a contractor can work one account without seeing the rest.
next step
two ways to get the system.
content os is the self-serve engine: start at $49/mo with no setup fee and cancel anytime. Prefer it done for you? floeberg studio designs and builds the site + tooling.
self-serve from $49/mo · no setup fee · studio build $7,499
not an agency?
Different vertical, same pattern. The pain shape changes. The engineering depth doesn't.